Jeffrey Epstein: Jews’ Choice

While working on one of the books in my Politix series, Conspiracy Science 101, I was stunned to see the headlines regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In my opinion, the Epstein case ranks with the John F. Kennedy assassination, Watergate and 9/11 as one of the most sensational modern American conspiracies.

Watergate was a landmark event in part because it is no longer a theory; it ended with criminal prosecution and convictions, a reminder that grand conspiracy isn’t just the stuff of science fiction.

JFK and 9/11 are united by a combination of tragedy and official narratives that were seemingly written by the blind. In addition, many conspiracy theorists see a Jewish connection in one or even both conspiracies.

The Jeffrey Epstein saga may or may not involve dead people, but his sick sex slave empire was nonetheless tragic. True to form, the official narrative of his death boggles the imagination. The prison’s security camera, which are apparently programmed to stop working whenever something dramatic happens to Epstein, are reminiscent of the fairy tale about the commercial airliner that struck the Pentagon without being photographed.

There’s also a Jewish connection. Epstein was a Jew himself, and it has long been rumored that he was associated with Israel’s spy agency, Mossad. His circle of friends included the Jewish legal celebrity Alan Dershowitz (accused of pedophilia himself), along with Donald Trump and Bill Clinton, both of whom can be considered virtual Jews.

Books about Epstein were published at least as early as 2017 (Filthy Rich: The Shocking True Story of Jeffrey Epstein The Billionaire’s Sex Scandal by James Patterson, John Connolly, et al.), and new titles are already popping up on Amazon, which has distinguished itself by banning books deemed “antisemitic.” That’s a pretty good clue that any Epstein titles hawked by Amazon aren’t going to tell the whole truth. But what is the whole truth?

I don’t want to turn this into an in depth analysis, so I’ll try my best to keep it brief.

First, we’re talking about at least two major conspiracies here. The first is Epstein’s sex trafficking empire, which was apparently headquartered on Pedophile Island, in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The second is Epstein’s strange death.

Pedophile Island

What I have to say about the first conspiracy theory can be summed up in one word: guilty.

Epstein faced justice once before and got off with a sweetheart deal that was simply stunning. Any sensible person who reviewed that case should have known that Epstein was a pedophile who had enough money and political connections to buy justice. He was defended by a sleazy Jewish attorney named Alan Dershowitz. Dershowitz was part of the legal team that defended O.J. Simpson and is associated with Harvard, arguably the most corrupt educational institution on the planet.

When Epstein was forced to face the law a second time, the flood gates opened. He was skewered and convicted by the media before he got to court. The media also had a field day trashing some of his powerful friends, including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, the Duke of York and Alan Dershowitz.

Jeffrey Epstein is a reminder that guilt isn’t necessarily dependent on a judge and jury. A combination of logic and evidence can actually be more reliable than the corrupt U.S. legal system. And when the media brazenly call a man like Jeffrey Epstein a pedophile, you know he’s a pedophile.

But there’s something odd about the situation. If the media are, as many people claim, not just corrupt but controlled by the famously clannish Jews, then why would they skewer one of their own? And why would they so willingly roast Epstein’s friends at the same time?

My best guess is that America’s media whores had their backs to the wall. The sensational nature of Epstein’s sickening crimes, combined with mounting evidence and a growing number of witnesses—with God knows how many other victims thinking of coming forward—made EpsteinGate a scandal that couldn’t conveniently be ignored or swept under the rug. Heads were likely to roll.

Still, it would be a mistake to praise the media for their courageous defense of Epstein’s victims. There’s nothing new about hurling vile accusations at Donald Trump, who appears to relish his role as a foil for the media. And if Trump wants to turn around and make accusations against Bill Clinton—well, what would you expect?

The media circus revolving around Epstein has little to say about the Jewish connection. It is rumored that Epstein may have been associated with Mossad, Israel’s dreaded intelligence/terrorism agency. I haven’t yet had a chance to investigate those claims.

There is another tantalizing possibility. There are some who claim that the Jews wallow in anti-Jewism (“antisemitism” in JewSpeak) the way they wallow in sleaze because they more or less like being hated. The theory is that the Jewish race is in danger of disintegrating without an outside threat to hold it together. So if the Jews aren’t really threatened, they either manufacture bogeymen or dream up ways to make people hate them.

Viewed from that perspective, the Jeffrey Epstein case really isn’t strange at all. It’s done a very good job of giving Jews yet another black eye, demonstrating both their extraordinary corruption and power.

Of course, we can never know exactly what the media are up to. Are there more sensational revelations that we aren’t being told about?

Who’s a Pedophile?

If there’s a silver lining, it’s the fact that virtually anyone associated with Epstein gets an automatic black eye and can even be considered a suspected pedophile. Have I already mentioned Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, the Duke of York and Alan Dershowitz?

Another person of interest who visited Epstein’s Caribbean playground is Les(lie) Wexner, a Jewish billionaire who was believed to be the main source of Epstein’s wealth. Curiously, Wexner claimed that Epstein had “misappropriated vast sums of wealth” from Wexner and his family.

Stranger still, Wexner didn’t make the accusation until after Epstein’s second incarceration. Is Wexner a pedophile who panicked after Epstein began making headlines and sought to distance himself by claiming he was one of Epstein’s victims? And did he ever file criminal charges against Epstein?

Word to the wise: You should still use a little caution before throwing around the P-word, lest you get sued for libel. You might find a question I posted on a legal forum of interest: Is it legal to call someone a pedophile without a conviction?

Given that a) virtually all the main players associated with Epstein are certifiable scumbags, and b) they presumably didn’t visit Pedophile Island for the purpose of photographing the wildlife, I think it’s safe to state our personal opinions.

Bill Clinton—Are you kidding? Billary has been associated with so many sleazy people—from Jeffrey Epstein to Barbra Streisand—and so many scandals and conspiracies, you have to wonder.

On the one hand, an army of unhinged conservatives have been manufacturing dirt on the Clinton’s for years. On the other hand, Monica Lewinsky turned out to be more than a rumor. The Vince Foster story is pretty interesting. Then there’s the Clinton’s shameful exploitation of Haiti in association with actor Sean Penn, who just happens to be—you guessed it—a Jew.

Alan Dershowitz is another disgusting Jewish/Zionist sleazebag who appears to be very sexist, to put it mildly. He’s also associated with Harvard, which spells P-E-D-O-P-H-I-L-E in my book.

Out of curiosity, I typed the following terms into Google to see how many hits each one would get:

  • “Donald Trump is a pedophile” – 92,600
  • “Bill Clinton is a pedophile” – 16,700
  • “Jeffrey Epstein is a pedophile” – 10,800
  • “Alan Dershowitze is a pedophile” – 816

In the public eye, Donald Trump appears to be king of the pedophiles, with Bill Clinton a distant second. Of course, Trump and Clinton are far more famous than Epstein, who many people had never even heard of until just a few weeks ago. Dershowitz is well known to people who tuned in for the O.J. Simpson soap opera, but he still flies under most people’s radar.

If you just type “is a pedophile” into Google, Jeffrey Epstein ranks very high, along with Roy Moore, a failed Alabama Senate candidate who, in September 2018, sued Israel’s Sacha Baron Cohen for defamation after being pranked on the comedian’s show “Who Is America?” (Cohen mocked Moore with a device supposedly invented by the Israeli Army to detect pedophiles.)

If I was going to hire someone to play the role of a pedophile in a movie, Cohen would likely be my first choice. The guy is the quintessentially sleazy Jew whose fame appears to revolve around his specialty—duping people who are relatively famous but sleazy (typically right-wingers) into appearing on TV with him, then pranking them, making them look foolish.

I also discovered an article claiming that Microsoft is something of a pedophile magnet, a charge I don’t find hard to believe.

Ironically, the Gates syndicate may be linked to Washington State’s most celebrated pedophile, the late judge Gary Little. The Seattle media did their best to sweep Little’s crimes under the rug, but the stench just kept getting worse. After the Seattle Post-Intelligencer finally outed him, he committed suicide.

When I was a teacher, I heard rumors about a pedophile sex-ring based in the Seattle School District’s headquarters that was supposedly run by Little. I’ve also heard rumors linking Bill Gates’ father and even Frank Blethen, owner of the right-wing Seattle Times, to this sex ring.

But are these just wild rumors?

Gary Little was a teacher at the Lakeside School for Boys about the time its student body included Bill Gates. Which isn’t to say that Little, who was gay, sodomized Bill Gates, though it’s a tantalizing possibility. But it’s also worth noting that Gary Little became a judge, while Bill Gates’ father was a lawyer. In addition, Bill Gates and his father would eventually come to regard the Seattle School District as their personal fiefdom, something I discovered when I first ran for public office in 1999. Surely, Bill Gates Sr. and Gary Little must have known each other.

More recently, Seattle Mayor Ed Murray resigned after he was accused of forcing Joseph Dyer into sex when Dyer was thirteen. Dyer was the fifth person to come forward with similar charges. He’s also the mayor’s cousin. Murray may therefore have the distinction of being Seattle’s first gay pedophile mayor.

I’ve come to use the term pedophile in a figurative sense to describe people who screw children, literally or figuratively. In my book, his disgusting exploitation of public schools makes Bill Gates one of America’s biggest “pedophiles,” even though I’ve never heard allegations of Gates having sex with anyone other than his wife (and perhaps his personal computer).

As a long-time political activist who has studied everything from history to psychology to philosophy, I think I have my head screwed on straight and have a pretty good understanding of my field. Yet I never cease to be amazed at the ease with which a research project or conspiracy theory can be transformed into a house of cards. In this case, I’ve built a case based on the word pedophile.

But there’s a catch: The word pedophile technically describes a sex predator who preys on pre-pubescent children. Most of the sewer rats described above exploited teens.* That obviously doesn’t whitewash their deeds, but they aren’t technically pedophiles unless they also had sex with children.

(*On the other hand, some of Epstein’s victims were reportedly as young as twelve, an age that ought to appear to sleazy Jewish-Harvard law professors.)

Ironically, my case is supported by The Stranger, a Zionist Seattle tabloid that, in its own way, screws children alongside Bill Gates. (See Jeffrey Epstein Is a Horrifying Person, But That Doesn’t Mean He’s a Pedophile, Katie Herzog, July 15, 2019) In fact, I’ve heard many people describe The Stranger as a “porno rag.”

I can easily imagine Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz taking turns sodomizing a six-year-old, while Bill Gates’ father takes notes. However, I’m aware of no evidence making such accusations, aside from the old school-district rumors about Bill Gates Sr.

This begs the question is it fair to call Jeffrey Epstein and his cronies pedophiles?

There’s no clear answer. It’s technically a phony charge, but these shitheads deserve to be demonized with all our power, and it’s hard to think of a word that inspires more revulsion than the P-word. (Ironically, Jews don’t even accuse Adolf Hitler of pedophilia, though Jews certainly have a reputation for embracing it.) The best substitute I can think of is “sex predator.” However, there’s a big difference between people who are deemed sex predators because they pat women they work with on the butt versus people who recruit teens and hold them captive, turning them into sex slaves.

What happened to Jeffrey Epstein?

Finally, we get back to the man who will probably go down in history as America’s most celebrated pedophile (even though George Washington and Thomas Jefferson may have had sex with their slaves’ children).

Pending trial, Epstein was incarcerated at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York City. On July 23 (my birthday!), he was reportedly found unconscious (or semi-conscious) in his cell with injuries to his neck. More precisely, he was found dead at 6:30 a.m….on a Saturday.

All corrupt politicians and media whores now that Saturday morning is the best time to air a messy news story that you want people to forget about. The date and time of Epstein’s murder thus constitute a clue that he didn’t die of voluntary suicide – not a huge, game-changing clue, but a clue nonetheless.

Epstein reportedly recollected nothing, and his cell mate, former New York City police officer Nicholas Tartaglione, who is charged with four counts of murder, denied knowledge of what happened. How strange is that?

According to NBC News, two sources said that Epstein might have tried to hang himself, a third said the injuries were not serious and could have been staged, while a fourth source said that an assault by his cell mate had not been ruled out.

Epstein was reportedly placed on suicide watch, which ended before his death. On August 10, 2019, Epstein was reportedly found dead in his cell, according to some sources. However, other sources say he was still alive, though unresponsive, when he was wheeled into New York Presbyterian-Lower Manhattan Hospital (Photos show Jeffrey Epstein as he’s wheeled into Downtown Hospital, New York Post).

That a criminal suspect of Jeffrey Epstein’s stature could be allowed to commit suicide or be murdered in prison defies belief. The four articles below pretty much sum it up.

On the other hand, conspiracy theorists around the world were probably predicting that something dramatic would derail this headline-making case. There were predictions that Epstein would be murdered or that some clever legal trick would rescue him from justice a second time. I speculated that he might be convicted, serving light duty (perhaps at Otisville) until he could be pardoned by Donald Trump.

So what actually happened?

First, let’s break it down into the two primary possibilities:

  1. The media are telling the truth.
  2. The media are not telling the truth.

If the media are telling the truth about Epstein’s death, then we’re still left with the question of how he died. Here are some possibilities:

  1. He inexplicably found a way to commit suicide.
  2. He was allowed to commit suicide.
  3. He was murdered.

If he was allowed to commit suicide or was murdered, then who’s the culprit? Some of the suspects touted by the media and conspiracy theorists include the following:

  1. Donald Trump
  2. Bill Clinton
  3. Mossad

As much as I hate Clinton, I don’t suspect him. Donald Trump is commander-in-chief now and presumably has far more control over the situation than Clinton. It’s possible that an organization like the CIA or Israel’s Mossad could have decided to take out Epstein, either without Trump’s knowledge or with his tacit approval.

But what if the media are lying, and Epstein is still alive? The list of prime suspects would probably not change. But why would they help Epstein escape from prison rather than murder him?

I don’t have the answers to what is a truly intriguing case, but here’s my initial analysis…

First, I’m amazed the Epstein investigation was allowed to go as far as it did, torpedoing a lot of famous, powerful people’s reputations and giving Jews yet another well deserved black eye.

I think we should consider the possibility, no matter how slight, that there’s some bigger picture that’s hard to grasp. Is it possible that some entity wanted Jeffrey Epstein’s monstrous crimes exposed, not because of an interest in seeing Epstein brought to justice but because doing so would advance some other agenda? I’m not suggesting anything specific here; I’m just throwing it out there as food for thought.

If the Epstein case was essentially what it seemed—a rare example of a powerful, politically connected Jewarchist (Jewish criminal) who was finally being held accountable—then any of the powerful people whose reputations were being torched by the revelations of Epstein’s victims (or simply by their association with Epstein) understandably would have wanted him silenced. But how could they accomplish that?

Below are some possibilities:

  1. Settle the case as quickly and painlessly as possible
  2. Get the case disbarred
  3. Arrange for Epstein to be convicted and sentenced to light duty until he could be pardoned by Donald Trump
  4. Arrange for Epstein to voluntarily commit suicide
  5. Have Epstein murdered
  6. Arrange Epstein’s escape from prison

For me, the first two choices and the fourth one are the most problematic. The Epstein case was a juggernaut, and I’m not sure how quickly and painlessly it could have been settled. How many victims were there who might have come forward, and what kind of secrets might they have divulged?

Getting the case disbarred might seem like the dreamiest solution, but it would have been a public relations nightmare. It’s hard to imagine how anyone could have any faith in the U.S. legal system after such a stunt.

Epstein might have chosen suicide over the alternative, spending the rest of his life in prison. But couldn’t he simply wait for his pal, Donald Trump, to pardon him? Even if that wasn’t in the cards for some reason, was he really up to hanging himself? I would prefer to be offered some kind of drug that let me go peacefully, with a smile on my face.

Pressuring Epstein into committing suicide would have entailed other problems. What if he simply refused? What if he threatened to divulge even darker secrets?

So that narrows the field to three finalists:

  1. Arrange for Epstein to be convicted and sentenced to light duty until he could be pardoned by Donald Trump
  2. Have Epstein murdered
  3. Arrange Epstein’s escape from prison

I predicted #1, but I was obviously wrong. One problem with my theory is that a conviction still would have presumably involved a trial and there’s no way of knowing how long it would have lasted or how messy things might have become.

So Epstein was either murdered or freed from prison. The latter might sound like an absurd theory, but it’s actually very plausible.

Either murder or freedom would have required at least one operative inside the prison. Either one would have required a conspiracy involving a hospital as co-conspirator. If Epstein was murdered, his body would have to be autopsied, a procedure that might have discovered something odd about his death.

If, on the other hand, Epstein was allowed to escape, the conspirators would have to fake his death, which would involve a fake autopsy. It isn’t as crazy as it sounds.

It would begin with one high-ranking hospital official agreeing to join in the conspiracy. Since America’s medical establishment is effectively owned and controlled by corporations, finding a corrupt scumbag willing to perform such a deed really shouldn’t be that hard. Of course, bribes always help.

The next step would be to work out the details, concoct a narrative, forge autopsy documents and recruit whatever additional personnel were needed to assist with the conspiracy.

How many people would it take to pull off such a stunt? I’m not sure, but it certainly wouldn’t number in the hundreds.

If an authentic autopsy had been performed, a team of paramedics presumably would have brought Epstein’s body to the hospital. I doubt that such a team would have consisted of more than half a dozen people.

Another team of people would have performed the autopsy. My understanding is that autopsies are usually performed by two people, an autopsy tech and the pathologist. They are sometimes accompanied by a student. In special cases, the procedure may be documented by a photographer, and a police officer may be present as a witness. So we’re probably talking about another five or six people, for a total of ten or eleven.

A few more conspirators might be required to tie up some loose ends. Of course, it would be helpful if the conspirators were all Jewish. Jews are notoriously clannish scumbags who won’t even blow the whistle on rabbis who infect their own babies with herpes. I’m not exaggerating.

A Seattle Hospital Conspiracy

I’m reminded of a sensational conspiracy that transpired here in Gothic Seattle in the 1990’s.

St. John Stanford, a retired general who had been recruited to serve as superintendent of the Seattle School District, was suffering from leukemia. One day, a tiny blurb in the Seattle Times announced that Stanford had slipped out of his room without permission and stepped outside for a breath of fresh air. End of story.

A friend whose wife worked at a Seattle hospital called me and breathlessly informed me that that was not the real story. Something much bigger was going on.

Sure enough, the media trotted out a new story the very next day. An article on the website HistoryLink.org offers a brief summary:

“Two weeks after entering a hospital for treatment, he [Stanford] took an unauthorized leave of absence, walked two and a half miles toward home, and was stopped by Seattle Police.”

The original story was much more colorful. Stanford left the hospital wearing nothing but a hospital gown and towing an IV tray, bound for home. The catch: He was described as perfectly lucid. It was also reported that the police at first thought he was a thief, caught, in the act of stealing an IV tray!

There’s a textbook example of a conspiracy uniting the Seattle School District, the Seattle Police Department, the media and a local hospital.

But why would conspirators want to go to the extra trouble of freeing Epstein when it would be easier to murder him?

One possibility is cooperation. Epstein’s death hasn’t ended the investigation into his criminal empire. If Epstein is still alive, then he can offer defendants information and advice that can help shoot down victims’ testimony. He might even assist in efforts to bribe or intimidate victims from coming forward.

So that’s my theory. I believe Jeffrey Epstein was either murdered or freed from prison. I think the murder scenario is the more likely explanation, but the possibility that he’s still alive should not be discounted.

Wow, and I thought this was going to be a short article!

Conspiracy Taxonomy

Incidentally, I’m working on a very ambitious conspiracy classification scheme which I’ll unveil in my forthcoming book, Conspiracy Science 101. Epstein figured in at least two major conspiracies, one involving sex trafficking, the other his fate.

I would tentatively use the following notation to describe Epstein’s sex trafficking empire:

Ev (serial) Oa

That means it was presumably a conspiracy event (Ev), as opposed to a systemic or super conspiracy. It can further be described as a serial conspiracy, because it wasn’t really limited to a single event. Epstein probably didn’t recruit teenage girls in order to acquire or maintain power; rather, he had other purposes (O). More precisely, he was interested in stealing people’s assets (in this case, sex) as opposed to punishing (e.g. assassination) or disempowering them (e.g. through mind control). Of course, I’m not ignorant of the fact that Epstein’s victims were indeed effectively punished and disempowered.

Jeffrey Epstein’s death (or kidnapping) was also a conspiracy event, classified as a classic Ev Od. It could conceivably be described as a conspiracy to maintain power by deflecting a criminal investigation that threatened to erode that power. However, I’m tentatively going to give it another O (“Other”), as the immediate goal was simply escaping justice.

His death, real or faked, presumably had nothing to do with stealing other people’s assets, and it wasn’t a brazenly punishing gesture. I think it can more correctly be described as a strategy aimed at disempowering (d) his enemies by pulling the rug out from under their feet.

The media conspiracy—and the media almost always play a role in cases of this magnitude—could probably be classified like this:

Ev (serial) Md

In other words, the media propagandists are focusing on a conspiracy event (actually two events, Epstein’s crimes and his death), but we’re looking a continuing deluge of articles for years to come. The media’s primary overall function can be described as maintenance of the empire (M), and they accomplish their mission primarily by disempowering (d) people through mind control.

Jeffrey Epstein Avatar

Before closing, let me introduce my tribute to Jeffrey Epstein. The Jews have given us usury and banksters, nuclear weapons, circumcision and very likely pornography, the father of propaganda, the father of anti-conspiracy, and maybe most of our wars. It would appear that Jeffrey Epstein has claimed the title Father of Pedophilia for himself, even if he wasn’t a true pedophile.

And so I designed an emblem to represent Epstein. It’s based on the Star of David, with the lower portion colored red to represent the Virgin Islands, the home of Pedophile Island. The Caribbean is further represented b a blue wavy line at the bottom of the design. In the center are the letters “JE,“” Jeffrey Epstein’s initials, over a segment of the wavy blue line representing the letter “W.”

I chose a Creative Commons license that allows people to freely display the image on websites and in books and magazines, just as long as you include the proper attribution).

Though not required, I would be delighted if you sent me a message if you display this image on one of your works. I’m curious to see how the world—and Google—reacts to this symbol.